DIGITAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF THE HUBERMAN LAB AUDIENCE ON REDDIT (2025)

For this academic research project, I investigated the digital fancultures of health and wellness media by conducting an empirical study on the “Huberman Lab” podcast audience across X, Instagram, YouTube, and Reddit. Utilizing Dawson’s (2018) brand community typologies (fans, advocates, haters) and Sharon & John’s (2024) parasocial listening dimensions, the study analysed the types of audience members present in Reddit communities and the types of gratifications they seek.

Specifically, I examined how audience members negotiate scientific information, share self-optimisation techniques, and build community identity. The implementation of transmedia gratification framework from Banks & Wasserman (2019) allowed my research to successfully map the specific motivations driving user engagement, ranging from “expanded experience” and “personal development” to the legitimisation of the digital community itself.

Research Questions

RQ1: How do participants of the “Hubermann’s lab” online communities discuss the information given on the podcast?

RQ2: What types of gratifications are sought during the process of engagement?

Research Methods

Data Collection: Scraping with Python

Data Processing: qualitative coding in MAXQDA

Visualisation: MAXQDA visual tools

Key Findings

The study built a typological overview of the audience members of the Huberman Lab podcast, providing answers to the questions of how do they discuss the podcast and what gratifications they seek. Two typologies of Banks & Wasserman (2019) and Sharon & John (2024) were merged. This has allowed to identify the key gratifications of online debates, (dis-)connection to the content, community/franchise legitimization, personal development, entertainment and expanded experience. Moreover, the types of imagined listeners present in the fandom were also identified and appended to the gratifications. This answered the second research question, and provided insights on the online debates, presence of ironic values and hate speech within the fandom.

Limitations & Further Research

Future research could examine one of the gratifications in a more precise manner, to create a more full picture of the fan engagement. Another focus could be a comparative study from the perspective of a creator and from the audiences. That would allow to compare how the was the message received and interpreted, which codes work and which do not. Using a mixed-methods approach is another suggestion that would bridge the gaps on the qualitative and quantitative data alone, giving this study more representativeness.

References

Banks, J., & Wasserman, J. A. (2019). The big screen treatment: Gratifications sought in game-to-film transmedia consumption. Poetics, 73, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.01.004

Dawson, V. R. (2018). Fans, Friends, Advocates, Ambassadors, and Haters: Social Media Communities and the Communicative Constitution of Organizational Identity. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511774636

Sharon, T., & John, N. A. (2024). “It’s between me and myself”: Inverse parasocial relationships in addressing (imagined) podcast listeners. New Media & Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482412879 3

Are you interested in publishing this article? Contact me via email!

ACADEMIC, CODING, No flair